Would it be such a good idea on a project such as Collins submarine computerization to leave people suffering?

from %26quot;critical incident stress disorder%26quot;, or suffering from %26quot;Stockholm syndrome%26quot;, solely responsible for safety critical software ?





Of course, these people could make an excellent contribution as part of a team. But if they are on the team won%26#039;t they tend to seize the reins and tend to generate incidents that generate %26quot;critical incident stress disorder%26quot; or %26quot;stockholm system%26quot; in third parties. If these third parties are drawn into the project won%26#039;t this cycle tend to continue ?
Would it be such a good idea on a project such as Collins submarine computerization to leave people suffering?
Not likely.





From my experience, people like this tend to get marginalized and/or thrown off the project. No one likes to work with others who cannot pull their weight, as a person suffering from either of these conditions would. The lead would be the first person to try to remove him or her.





Now I know what you%26#039;re thinking, you%26#039;re thinking %26quot;what if the lead is the nutcase?%26quot; Well, that could happen. In this case, his or her immediate supervisor on the project would do the same thing -- get him or her replaced.





I%26#039;ve seen this (actually, I benefited from this) on one program.


The lead did not listen to the customer. The customer insisted that the guy be replaced.